(PC) Jimenez v. Superior Court of California, County of Kings

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20201:19-cv-01780California517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY JIMENEZ, No. 1:19-cv-01780-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ACTION COUNTY OF KINGS, et al., (Doc. No. 15) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Rudy Jimenez is state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 15, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and issued findings and recommendations recommending that the FAC be dismissed without further leave to amend being granted. (Doc. No. 15.) The magistrate judge found that plaintiff’s claims brought pursuant to § 1983 are barred because he alleges that he is unlawfully incarcerated and he requests declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and $75…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.