(PC) Barnes v. Van Ness
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20201:20-cv-00625California1,935 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00625-NONE-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v. REQUEST FOR AN ORDER UNDER THE
ALL WRITS ACT BE DENIED
VAN NESS, (ECF No. 29) Defendant.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE DAYS
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO
COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
18 (ECF No. 29)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND
PLAINTIFF A COPY OF HIS COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)
Antoine Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice (ECF No. 29), which the Court construes as a motion for an order under the All Writs Act and for appointment of pro bono counsel. For the reasons described below, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s request for…