(PC) Barnes v. Van Ness

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20201:20-cv-00625California1,935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00625-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. REQUEST FOR AN ORDER UNDER THE

ALL WRITS ACT BE DENIED

VAN NESS, (ECF No. 29) Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO

COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

18 (ECF No. 29)

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND

PLAINTIFF A COPY OF HIS COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)

Antoine Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice (ECF No. 29), which the Court construes as a motion for an order under the All Writs Act and for appointment of pro bono counsel. For the reasons described below, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.