(SS) Byers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20202:20-cv-00001California6,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALAINA MARIE BYERS, No. 2:20-CV-0001-DMC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, see ECF Nos. 8 and 9, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Pending before the court are the parties’ briefs on the merits, see ECF Nos. 17 and 18. The Court reviews the Commissioner’s final decision to determine whether it is: (1) based on proper legal standards; and (2) supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. See Tackett v. Apfel, 180 F.3d 1094, 1097 (9th Cir. 1999). “Substantial evidence” is more than a mere scintilla, but less than a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.