Newsom

(PC) Stout v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20202:20-cv-01674California370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOUGLAS J. STOUT, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01674-CKD P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND THEODORE CURTIS ROWE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs are two state prisoners proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Stout has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. However, plaintiff Rowe has not filed any such motion. In light of the fact that this civil rights action was filed as a purported class action by both inmates, the court will deny the pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis as incomplete. By order filed August 31, 2020, plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Following an extension of time, plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint in the time period provided. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Stout’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.