(PC)Jones

(PC)Jones v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20202:20-cv-01984California904 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-1984 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CURTIS ALLEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has also filed a motion to amend the complaint. ECF No. 7. For the reasons stated below, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the motion to amend will be granted. Plaintiff will also be provided with specific directions about how file an amended complaint properly. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See ECF Nos. 2, 5. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.