Garcia-Brower

(PS) Paskiewicz v. Garcia-Brower

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20202:20-cv-02238California2,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIANNA C. PASKIEWICZ, No. 2:20-cv-02238 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA LABOR COMISSIONER

LILIA GARCIA BROWER; SHARON

HILLIARD, DIRECTOR OF

UNEMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT;

CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYMENT

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

“EDD”; CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY

GENERAL ZAVIER BECERRA,

18 Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) will therefore be granted. I. Screening The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.