Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20201:12-cv-01156California2,762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MARY LATTIMORE, et al., (Doc. No. 120) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. BACKGROUND This case has had a lengthy history since its filing in 2012. (Doc. No. 1.) In this order the court will recount only the events which have transpired since November 5, 2018, when the undersigned granted plaintiff leave to file a fifth amended complaint related to her claim that defendant M. Baron had placed her a “snitch jacket” on her. (Doc. No. 113 at 4.) On November 26, 2018, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time was entered on the docket. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.