Cates

(PC) Windom v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20201:20-cv-01316California3,196 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SOLOMON WINDOM, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01316-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 10 v. ) )

R THA IN SD AO CM TL IOY N A SSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

B. CATES, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) ) R FOE RC O FM AIM LUEN RD E I TN OG C D OIS MM PI LS YS A WL I TO HF AA C CT OI UO RN T Defendants. ) ORDER, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND ) FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM ) FOR RELIEF ) ) (ECF No. 12) ) 16 Plaintiff Solomon Windom is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Plaintiff filed the instant action on September 15, 2020. On October 2, 2020, the Court 19 screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an 20 amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond 21…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.