Tito

Tito v. Westlake Financial Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20201:20-cv-01262California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APELU L. TITO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01262-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET

v. TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, (ECF No. 8) Defendant.

16 This action was filed on September 4, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On December 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), ‘a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.’ ” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). The Ninth Circuit has held that Rule 41(a) allows a plaintiff to dismiss without a court order any defendant who has yet to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.