Loadholt
(PC) Patton v. Loadholt
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant Brar was his primary care provider in 2008. (ECF No. 9 at 5.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that defendant Brar be dismissed. On September 12, 2019, the undersigned ordered e-service of defendant Brar. (ECF No. 11.) On October 9, 2019, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) notified the court that it would not waive service for defendant Brar. (ECF No. 15.) Defendant Brar had separated from CDCR with no contact information. (Id.) The United States Marshal was unable to serve defendant Brar due to the lack of contact information. (ECF No. 19.) On…