Weiskircher
Weiskircher v. American Airlines, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 NATHANIEL WEISKIRCHER et al., No. 2:19–cv–2582–JAM–KJN 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL & 12 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., (ECF No. 19) 14 Defendant. 15 On December 3, 2020, the court held a remote hearing on defendant’s motions to compel responses to several requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and amended answers to multiple interrogatories. (ECF No. 19.) Prior to the hearing, because plaintiffs’ counsel, Robert A. Heintz, failed to participate in the creation of the Local Rule 251(c) joint statement regarding the discovery disagreement, defense counsel filed a declaration regarding the discovery disagreement and the efforts to secure plaintiffs’ cooperation, pursuant to Local Rule 251(d). (ECF No. 21.) At the hearing, Xakema Henderson appeared for defendant; there was no 23 appearance for plaintiffs. (ECF No. 22.) For the following reasons, the court GRANTS
1 On November 13, 2020, the court informed the parties by minute order that the…