Weiskircher

Weiskircher v. American Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20202:19-cv-02582California2,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 NATHANIEL WEISKIRCHER et al., No. 2:19–cv–2582–JAM–KJN 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL & 12 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., (ECF No. 19) 14 Defendant. 15 On December 3, 2020, the court held a remote hearing on defendant’s motions to compel responses to several requests for production of documents (“RFPs”) and amended answers to multiple interrogatories. (ECF No. 19.) Prior to the hearing, because plaintiffs’ counsel, Robert A. Heintz, failed to participate in the creation of the Local Rule 251(c) joint statement regarding the discovery disagreement, defense counsel filed a declaration regarding the discovery disagreement and the efforts to secure plaintiffs’ cooperation, pursuant to Local Rule 251(d). (ECF No. 21.) At the hearing, Xakema Henderson appeared for defendant; there was no 23 appearance for plaintiffs. (ECF No. 22.) For the following reasons, the court GRANTS

1 On November 13, 2020, the court informed the parties by minute order that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.