(PC) Micenheimer v. Kern Valley State Prison
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, No. 1:19-cv-00115-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
FOR RECONSIDERATION
KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, (Doc. Nos. 25, 26, 27) Defendant.
16 Plaintiff Cory Dwayne Micenheimer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 13, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and dismissed it with leave to amend. (Doc. No. 22.) The screening order directed plaintiff to file a second amended complaint not exceeding twenty-five pages that cured the deficiencies identified in the screening order within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. (Id. at 8.) On June 10, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for a sixty-day extension of time…