(PC) Roberts v. Henderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20201:20-cv-00592California2,304 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

BACKGROUND

19 This case has a rather lengthy background given Plaintiff’s failure to comply with and respond 20 to the Court’s orders. 21 Plaintiff filed the instant action on April 20, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) 22 On May 1, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s original compliant, found it failed to state any 23 cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF 24 No. 11.) 25 Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint on June 5, 2020. (ECF No. 14.) On June 17, 2020, 26 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file a 27 second amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) 28 Plaintiff failed to file a second amended complaint. Therefore, on July 27, 2020, the Court issued an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with a court order. (ECF No. 17.) After Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the action on August 11, 2020. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and 6 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.