Krause

(PC) Robertson v. Krause

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:17-cv-01426California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE JEROME ROBERTSON, No. 2:17-cv-1426 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. KRAUSE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 23). For the reasons stated below, the court shall order that the FAC be served on defendant T. Krause. I. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff’s FAC alleges that on January 30, 2016, while he was housed at High Desert State Prison, Correctional Officer T. Krause deployed an expulsion grenade at his cell door.1 (See ECF No. 23 at 3). As a result, plaintiff was exposed to a chemical agent from head to foot. (See id. at 3). 27 Plaintiff states that he was not a part of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.