(PS) Winston v. EDC Animal Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAREL WINSTON and ALMA MARIE No. 2:19-cv-0923 MCE DB PS

WINSTON,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. EDC ANIMAL SERVICES, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Charel Winston and Alma Marie Winston are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendant County of El Dorado’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 31.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on May 22, 2019, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On February 4, 2020, the undersigned dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint and granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 25.)…