(PS) Noeldner v. United States Government

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:19-cv-00775California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN LYNN NOELDNER, No. 2:19-cv-0775 KJM DB PS

ANGELA TEARLE NOELDNER,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al., 16 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs Jonathan Noeldner and Angela Noeldner are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On October 2, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiffs have not filed any objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.