Petras

(PC) Ray v. Petras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:19-cv-01865California1,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. RAY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01865-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING LEAVE TO AMEND

v. ECF No. 37 ONGNEN PETRAS, et al., Objections due in Fourteen Days Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony D. Ray is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He filed this action on September 17, 2019, ECF No. 1 and, after screening his complaint, Magistrate Judge Brennan1 found that he had stated cognizable Eighth Amendment medical deliberate indifference claims against defendants Petras, McAllister, and Bick based on their alleged failure to treat plaintiff’s brain tumor. ECF No. 6. Defendants were served and, after two requests from defendants to modify the scheduling order, Judge Brennan directed that: all discovery requests be served by November 18, 2020, all discovery be completed January 13, 2021, and any dispositive motions be filed by April 21, 2021. ECF No. 30. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.