Arya

(PC) Hamm v. Arya

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20202:20-cv-02027California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN M. HAMM, No. 2:20-cv-2027 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

AFSHIN ARYA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. By an order issued on October 20, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or, in the alternative, to pay the required filing fees. (See ECF No. 4). At that time, plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (See id. at 2). The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has neither filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit nor responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.