(HC) Yocom v. Attorney General

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20201:20-cv-01141California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. YOCOM, No. 1:20-cv-01141-DAD-SAB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

ATTORNEY GENERAL, (Doc. No. 18) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Michael A. Yocom is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 20, 2020, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 8), dismissing petitioner’s petition for federal habeas relief because petitioner’s direct appeal of his state court judgment of conviction is still pending before the state appellate court. (Doc. No. 14.) Judgment was entered on November 20, 2020. (Doc. No. 15.) On December 4, 2020, petitioner appealed the court’s order to the Ninth Circuit Court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.