Beggins

Beggins v. Carpenter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20202:18-cv-01550California5,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BEGGINS, No. 2:18-cv-01550-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER CAROL CARPENTER, et al., Defendants.

17 Two motions are before the court: (1) the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Carol Carpenter and Brian Carpenter (“Carpenter defendants” or “the Carpenters”), Defs.’ Mot. for Summ. J. (“Defs.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 31; Defs.’ Mem., ECF No. 31-2, and raising jurisdictional questions of standing and mootness; and (2) the motion for partial summary judgment filed by plaintiff David Beggins (“plaintiff” or “Mr. Beggins”), Pl.’s Mot. for Partial Summ. J. (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 30; Pl.’s Mem., ECF No. 30-1. The Carpenter defendants opposed plaintiff’s motion, Defs.’ Opp’n, ECF No. 36, and plaintiff replied, Pl.’s Reply, ECF No. 41. Likewise, plaintiff opposed the Carpenter defendants’ motion, Pl.’s Opp’n, ECF No. 37, and the Carpenter defendants replied, Defs.’ Reply, ECF No. 39. Defendants City of Corning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.