(PC) Hunter v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HAROLD HUNTER, No. 2:19-cv-1101 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
GABRIEL WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed June 3, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and he was given the option to proceed immediately on his Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Do-Williams for moving him to an upper tier, taking away his wheelchair, and denying his request for a mobility vest and walker, or to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 6 at 10.) Plaintiff notified the court that he wanted to amend the complaint, (ECF No. 7), and was given thirty days to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 8). He was advised that if he failed to file an amended complaint the case would proceed on the original complaint, as screened, and it would be recommended that the non-cognizable claims against Do-Williams and all claims against defendants Williams, Gonzales, Battle, Adams, Halepota, Malakkla, Mansour, Cole,…