(PC) Smith v. Parole Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20202:19-cv-02454California388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHNOY X. SMITH, No. 2:19-cv-02454-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER PAROLE BOARD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony Smith (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 24.) On October 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 25.) The Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.