Bikoba

Mitchell v. Bikoba

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20202:20-cv-02410California2,343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTA MITCHELL, No. 2:20-cv-02410-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER VERONIQUE N. BIKOBA, et al. Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Krista Mitchell’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) (ECF No. 1) and Motions to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF Nos. 3, 5). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions and DISMISSES this action. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On September 11, 2020, Defendants Veronique N. Bikoba (“Bikoba”), Thomas F. Rutaganira (“Rutaganira”), Keith M. Banks (“Banks”), and Pakpour Banks LLP (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an unlawful detainer action against Plaintiff in Yolo County Superior Court.1 (ECF No. 6-10 at 1.) On December 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court challenging the unlawful detainer action. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.