(PS) Murphy v. Colony Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHANNO O. MURPHY ESQ. SR., DBA No. 2:20-cv-0303 JAM CKD (PS)

SHEETMETAL & ASSOCIATES,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

CONOLY INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 Defendant.

17 On August 31, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 6) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On September 16, 2020, plaintiffs filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 7), which have been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been…