Phifer
(HC) Jones v. Phifer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20201:20-cv-00755California469 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEREMY JONES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00755-DAD-EPG-HC
Petitioner, ORDER TERMINATING PETITIONER’S
REQUEST TO WITHDRAW WRIT
v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
PHIFER, TO SEND PETITIONER A PRISONER
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT FORM AND
Respondent. TO CLOSE CASE
(ECF No. 12)
17 Petitioner Jeremy Jones is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of mandamus and request for emergency injunctive relief. On July 15, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendation recommending dismissal of the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 5). On December 7, 2020, the Court received the instant request to withdraw the petition for writ of mandate with leave to refile under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 12). The Court construes the request as a notice of dismissal. See Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 381–82 (2003) (courts may recharacterize a pro se motion to “create a better correspondence between the 26 …