Patrick Warnshuis v. Amazon.Com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20201:19-cv-01454California4,933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 PATRICK WARNSHUIS, CASE NO. 1:19-CV-1454 AWI BAM

Plaintiff

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND

BAUSCH HEALTH U.S., LLC f/k/a Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, LLC, et al., (Doc. No. 39)

Defendants

12 13 This is a products liability case that stems from the ingestion of an allegedly tainted nasal spray, “Ocean Saline Nasal Spray,” by Plaintiff Patrick Warnshuis (“Warnshuis”). The operative complaint is the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), which was filed after the Court granted in part a Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Currently before the Court is Defendant Bausch Health U.S., LLC’s (“Bausch”) Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, Bausch’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 20 BACKGROUND From the Complaint, in April 2018, Warnshuis bought Ocean Saline Nasal Spray through Defendants Amazon.com, LLC and Amazon.com,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.