(HC) Antoine D. Barnes v. United States President Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20201:20-cv-01126California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-01126-NONE-HBK Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING WITH MODIFICATION

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS PETITION FOR WRIT OF

HABEAS CORPUS

UNITED STATES PRESIDENT TRUMP, (Doc. Nos. 1, 5) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Antoine Deshawn Barnes, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has petitioned the court for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1.) Petitioner asks this court in two related claims to issue a patent for his “full name, images, face, [and] body.” (Id. at 3.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302, the instant federal habeas petition was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge. On August 21, 2020, the then–assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 5.) Those findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.