(PS) Mehl v. Countrywide Bank, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GAVIN MEHL, No. 2:19-cv-01005-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK, NA, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is an individual proceeding pro se in this civil action. The matter was referred to 18 the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 On November 10, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 21 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 23 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 24 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 25 1983). 26 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 27 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and…