Haskins

(PC) Webster v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20201:18-cv-01640California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS WEBSTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01640-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT

HASKINS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING

DISCLOSURE OR DISCOVERY BY THE

HASKINS, DEFENDANT Defendant. (ECF No. 59) TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff Thomas Webster (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained under California Welfare Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). This action proceeds against Defendant Haskins for denial of adequate medical care in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 22, 37.) Currently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.