Diaz

(PC) Sandoval v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20201:20-cv-01314California572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01314-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

v. (ECF No. 18)

DIAZ, et al., ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Julio Sandoval (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 24, 2020, the Court screened the complaint and granted Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 17.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a stay of proceedings, filed December 9, 2020. (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff states that he received the Court’s screening order on December 2, 2020, but he needs 70 days to amend his complaint. Plaintiff states that he is in quarantine due to COVID-19, and at this time has no access to the law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.