Reddy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, Jr., Case No. 2:17-cv-01434-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

REDDY, et al. ECF No. 58 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On November 3, 2020, defendants filed a motion to modify the scheduling order and to compel plaintiff to provide responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents. ECF No. 58. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a…