Mohyddin

(PC) Frantz v. Mohyddin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 11, 20201:20-cv-01550California2,002 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KARL FRANTZ, Case No.: 1:20-cv-01550-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION MOHYDDIN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendants. CLAIMS

(ECF No. 9) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Karl Frantz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened by the Court 20 and Plaintiff was allowed leave to amend. (ECF No. 1, 8.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, 21 filed on November 30, 2020 is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 9.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.