Beltran

Beltran v. Superior Court of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20201:19-cv-01436California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEBASTIAN P. BELTRAN, No. 1:19-cv-1436-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (Doc. No. 7) 15 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et 16 al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Sebastian P. Beltran is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 7, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim and failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc No. 7.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days. (Id.) On July 7, 2020, plaintiff untimely filed a document which appears to be a proposed Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 10.) The court construes this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.