(SS) Wetzel v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20201:20-cv-01511California2,475 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARITA WETZEL, Case No. 1:20-cv-1511-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ORDER AND DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

SECURITY, COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant. (ECF No. 4)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

16 Sarita Wetzel (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action seeking judicial review of the denial of disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. On November 5, 2020, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and an order issued finding that Plaintiff had failed to demonstrate that she had complied with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days of November 5, 2020. More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.