Ronquillo

Ronquillo v. Universal Recovery Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20201:20-cv-00248California199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BECKY E. RONQUILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00248-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO

v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

B UNIVERSAL RECOVERY

CORPORATION, (ECF No. 17) Defendant. 15 On September 10, 2018, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ 20 fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.