Rackley

(PC) Davis v. Rackley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20202:18-cv-00090California1,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBBIE DAVIS, No. 2:18-cv-00090-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. RACKLEY, M. VOONG, J. ABARCA,

DANIELS, O. ZAPATA, P. TREICHEL,

S. IKEMOTO, J. SMITH,

16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Robbie Davis’s (“Plaintiff”) two filings in which he requests the Court reopen his case, which the Court construes together as a Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 16, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) On February 4, 2019, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). (ECF No. 6.) The magistrate judge dismissed the Complaint on the basis that Plaintiff’s purported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.