Randy
(PC) Poarch v. Randy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY ROOSEVELT POARCH, Case No. 2:20-cv-01191-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
LENICK RANDY, et al. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
18 On September 3, 2020, the previously assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint, found that it failed to state a claim, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 20. Rather than filing an amended complaint, plaintiff subsequently filed four one-page documents that are largely unintelligible. ECF No. 21-23, 25. On October 22, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff was warned that failure to respond to the court’s order could…