Lopez

Lopez v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20202:20-cv-01310California2,949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOSEPH LOPEZ, JOSHUA SARRIS, No. 2:20-cv-01310-JAM-JDP CODY DANTE, and SHANE PECK, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS v.

BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC., and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Booz Allen Hamilton’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for failure to plead allegations of fraud with specificity and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Mot., ECF No. 6. Joseph Lopez, Joshua Sarris, Cody Dante, and Shane Peck (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition to Defendant’s motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 8. Defendant replied. Def.’s Reply, ECF No. 9. After consideration of the parties’ briefing on the motion and relevant legal authority, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.1

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for October 27, 2020. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.