Fisher

(PC) Hunter v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20201:19-cv-00625California546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN HUNTER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00625-AWI-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS

v. (ECF No. 70) FISHER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Nathan Hunter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Cui,1 Thompson, Fisher, and Hernandez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, which is fully briefed. On December 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for sanctions in response to Defendants reply to Plaintiff’s supplemental opposition to the pending motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 70.) Defendants have not had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s motion, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. The motion is deemed submitted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.