(PS) Conerly v. Veracity Research Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARINA CONERLY, No. 2:19-cv-1021-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

v. (ECF No. 44) VERACITY RESEARCH CO. LLC, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Carina Conerly, proceeding pro se, asserts claims against defendants Veracity Research Co., LLC (a Texas company) and one of its employees, Kristy Torain. (ECF No. 12.) Defendants now move to dismiss, asserting the currently-operative Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. (ECF No. 44.) The undersigned recommends the motion to dismiss be GRANTED, and leave to amend be DENIED. 23 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21) for the entry of findings and recommendations. See Local Rule 304.

2 The parties also proffer arguments concerning claims raised in the second amended complaint on behalf of James Conerly, Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, and a minor…