Becerra

(PS) Giddens v. Becerra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20202:19-cv-01263California4,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GIDDENS, No. 2:19-cv-1263 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. XAVIER BECERRA, in his official FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; and SOLANO COUNTY, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Richard Giddens is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants Xavier Becerra and Solano County’s motions to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF Nos. 21 & 22.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted and the amended complaint dismissed without further leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on July 9, 2019, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.