Coleman

(PS) Coleman v. Coleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20202:20-cv-00548California456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY ALLEN COLEMAN, No. 2:20-CV-00548 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. MELISSA LEA COLEMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Timothy Allen Coleman (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se in this civil action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) On November 20, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 6.) This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.