Huitt

Huitt v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20202:20-cv-00954California800 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 PATRICIA HUITT, No. 2:20-cv-00954-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: MOTION TO STAY

PROCEEDINGS PENDING A

TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DECISION BY THE JUDICIAL

TEVA WOMEN’S HEALTH LLC; TEVA PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT

WOMEN’S HEALTH INC., LITIGATION Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Patricia Huitt (“plaintiff”) brought this action against Defendants Teva Women’s Health, LLC, Teva Women’s Health, Inc., and Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc (“defendants” or “Teva”) seeking damages related to defendants’ design manufacture, surveillance, sale, marketing, advertising, promotion, labeling, packaging, and distribution of the ParaGard Intrauterine Medical Device (“ParaGard IUD”). Before the court is plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Proceedings pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) as to whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.