Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20201:17-cv-00294California669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, No. 1:17-cv-00294-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING IN

GOMEZ, et al., PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. (Doc. No. 37)

17 Plaintiff Christopher Dickson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 9, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that: (1) defendants’ motion for summary judgment based upon plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit be granted in part and denied in part; (2) plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim brought against defendant Sao be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to first exhaust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.