Doe
(PC) Anderson v. Doe
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON, No. 1:20-cv-01620-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING IN
JOHN DOE, FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS, AND
DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FILING FEE
Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 2, 5)
17 Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 16, 2020, plaintiff filed a notice stating he had filed his application to proceed in forma pauperis with the“[Valley State Prison] inmate trust office with simple instructions to use [a] pre-addressed and paid-postage envelope and send directly to the Court, today.” (Doc. Nos. 2; 5 at 1 n.1.) On November 19, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff not be…