Petersen

Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20201:20-cv-00884California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., (Doc. No. 16) Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Kyle Petersen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the undersigned’s November 23, 2020 order (Doc. No. 15) adopting the assigned magistrate judge’s September 2, 2020 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 10). (Doc. No. 16.) In that order, the court stayed this action pending resolution of plaintiff’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit from the judgment of conviction in his criminal case. (Doc. No. 15.) In particular, the court found the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.