Santoro

(PC) Arrant v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20201:20-cv-01253California1,069 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN R. ARRANT, No. 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (1) DENYING

KELLY SANTORO, et al., MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

Defendants. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION and (2) (Doc. Nos. 2, 10, 13) 17 18 Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On September 3, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 2.) On October 28, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.