(PS) Narayan v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, No. 2:19-cv-00466-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 108) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of two of the undersigned’s prior orders. (ECF No. 108.) Defendants have filed an opposition. (ECF No. 109). On the court’s own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the matter is taken under submission, and the court now DENIES plaintiff’s motion for the following reasons. Plaintiff’s motion seeks reconsideration of the court’s written order dated September 22, 2020 (ECF No. 104) and a minute order issued November 4, 2020 (ECF No. 106). Initially, plaintiff’s motion must be denied because it was deficiently noticed. The caption of plaintiff’s November 23, 2020 motion lists a hearing date of “01/15/2020” (ECF No. 108 at 1), and plaintiff did not serve or file a separate notice of the motion clarifying the…