Bobbala

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:19-cv-1203 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. LINDQUIST, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed objections to defendant’s request to opt-out of the Post-Screening ADR Project, ECF No. 68, to defendant’s answer to the complaint, ECF No. 69, and to the scheduling and discovery order, ECF No. 70. He has also filed a motion for preliminary injunction. ECF No. 71. Plaintiff has objected to defendant’s request to opt-out of the Post-Screening ADR Project and moves for the court deny the request. ECF No. 68. There is no right to participate in the ADR Project. The order sending this case to the Post-Screening ADR Project explicitly provided that defendant could opt-out if defense counsel in good faith found that a settlement conference would be a waste of resources. ECF No. 55 at 2. Defendant’s counsel…