Enlers

(PC) Rodriguez v. Enlers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20202:20-cv-02399California1,650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:20-cv-2399-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. EULERS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. He also a requests appointment of a Spanish-speaking interpreter and/or attorney. ECF No. 4. As discussed below, his in forma pauperis application is granted and the court screens the complaint. The request for appointment of an attorney/interpreter is denied. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). ///// ///// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.